A controversy concerning inclusivity and privacy rights is sparked after Utah State cancels a volleyball match against San Jose State due to a trans athlete.

Due to the presence of a transgender athlete on the opposing squad, Utah State University canceled their volleyball match against San Jose State.

One contentious topic has been the involvement of transgender athletes. While detractors contend that trans athletes might have a physical edge, supporters promote inclusivity. There were boycotts and contentious discussions during the 2024 Olympics as a result of this argument. In the US, a number of colleges have canceled games featuring San Jose State’s transgender athlete, including Utah State.

Utah State recently forfeited games against San Jose State, joining three other universities in doing so. They acknowledged their decision to skip the October 23 game in a statement, but they gave no justification for the change.

None of the universities that forfeited specifically linked their choices to the transgender athlete. The University of Wyoming did, however, allude to extensive internal deliberations that shaped their decision. In reference to the forfeiture’s official record, Utah State stated that it would adhere to Mountain West Conference regulations.

San Jose State spokesperson Michelle Smith McDonald stressed the importance of privacy rights under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). She said she was disappointed by the forfeitures:

“Our SJSU student-athletes, who comply fully with NCAA and Mountain West rules, are being unfairly denied opportunities to compete. We remain committed to providing an inclusive, fair, and respectful environment for all student-athletes.”

This wave of forfeitures reportedly stemmed from rumors published by a conservative website. An anonymous parent interviewed by the site claimed there were unverified reports of a trans athlete on San Jose State’s team, sparking the controversy.

The NCAA is currently defending a lawsuit brought by women athletes, including Riley Gaines and Brooke Slusser, who allege Title IX violations. Slusser claims a trans teammate admitted their gender identity, which she believes led to emotional and physical distress.

The lawsuit accuses the NCAA of failing to ensure fair competition and adequate safeguards for all athletes. The NCAA has defended its policies, citing significant investments in women’s sports and a commitment to fairness in competition.

The controversy highlights another critical issue: the trans athlete’s gender identity was leaked without consent. Equality California’s executive director, Tony Hoang, criticized the forfeitures, stating they reflect broader political attacks on the LGBTQ+ community. He emphasized that such actions harm all students involved.